The Resource Curse, ExplainedExplained 19 October 2026 · 8 min read · 116 reads
Money · Business · Nagpur
The Resource Curse, Explained Explained
Why some places rich in oil, coal or crops stay poor, why the idea is debated, and what one region in India can and cannot tell us.
It sounds backwards. A place finds oil, coal or a rich crop. You would expect it to get wealthy. And sometimes it does. But economists have noticed for decades that some places with the most natural wealth stay stuck, while places with almost
Earn Embers for what you read
Sign in, answer a few quick questions about this piece, and earn Embers you can spend in the app.
nothing
build
rich
economies.
This pattern has a name: the resource curse. I have been reading about it. I want to explain it in plain words and show where it holds and where it does not. Then I will use one region in India as a case to think about, not a verdict.
What the idea says
The Wikipedia article on the resource curse describes it as the idea that countries rich in natural resources often have slower growth, less democracy or worse development than countries without them. It is also called the "paradox of plenty". The article says the economist Richard Auty first used the term in 1993, and that a 1995 study by Jeffrey Sachs and Andrew Warner found a strong link between resource wealth and poor growth.
Now the important part. The same article says most experts believe it is not universal or inevitable, and shows up under certain conditions. A resource is not a trap. It becomes a trap under certain conditions. And there is real disagreement. The article cites a 2016 meta-study (a study of many studies) by Havranek, Horvath and Zeynalov, which found that overall support for the idea is weak once you account for biases in what gets published and differences in method. It also says there is no academic agreement on the effect, at least as of 2023.
So when you hear "the resource curse is a fact", be careful. A better way to say it is: "In some places, under some conditions, resource wealth has come with weaker economies."
How a boom can hurt
The article describes a few ways it can happen. Here are the ones that make the most sense to me.
Dutch disease. The name comes from the Netherlands, after a big natural gas discovery in 1959. When a country sells a lot of one resource abroad, the demand for its money rises. Its currency gets stronger. That makes everything else it sells more expensive for foreign buyers, so factories and farms in other sectors lose out.
Price swings. Commodity prices bounce around a lot. The article gives oil as an example, rising from about 10 dollars a barrel to about 145 over 1998 to 2008, then falling by more than half within a few months. A government or a region that depends on that income finds it hard to plan.
Weak rules. The article says institutions, meaning the rules, courts and habits that run a society, are often the deciding factor. One researcher it cites, Michael Ross, says only one type of resource, petroleum, has been consistently linked with less democracy and worse institutions.
Resource boomBig exports of one thing
Stronger currencyForeign demand pushes it up
Other goods cost moreHarder to sell abroad
Other sectors shrinkFactories, farms, services
More dependenceOn the one resource
Places that avoided it
The article also lists examples going the other way. Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea are named as resource-poor economies that spent heavily on education, which the article says contributed in part to their success (it adds that other researchers dispute this). I find that a useful thought: what you build on top of what you have may matter as much as what you have.
It gives examples of trouble too. Venezuela comes up several times in connection with oil. The article also says Nigeria and Venezuela saw their debts grow quickly during the oil boom of the 1970s (that line is tagged on Wikipedia as needing a source). In Angola, the article says about 99.3 percent of exports came from oil and diamonds in 2005. When one item is nearly everything you sell, a single price drop reaches everyone.
A region to think about: Vidarbha
Now to the region I promised. Vidarbha is in the east of the Indian state of Maharashtra. Wikipedia says it has 11 districts and about 23 million people in the 2011 census, which is 21.3 percent of the state's population, spread over 31.6 percent of its area.
What does it have? The article says oranges and cotton are the main crops. It names coal and manganese as the main minerals, and says one district, Chandrapur, contributes 29 percent of the state's mineral output and has a thermal power station described as one of the biggest in India. It also says the region is considered economically underdeveloped compared with the rest of Maharashtra.
Here is the temptation: to say "resources, but poor, so it must be the resource curse." I do not think we can say that, and I want to be careful.
First, the resource curse research is mostly about whole countries, not regions inside one country. Vidarbha's money, rules and taxes are tied to a state and a nation, so the picture is mixed in ways a country study does not cover.
Second, the curse is conditional. I have not found a study that tests this idea for Vidarbha, so I do not know the answer. The same Wikipedia article notes that the region faces other problems, such as low rainfall and farm distress. It also records a long-running demand for a separate state. And it cites Shrikant Jichkar, who in a 2000 article argued against it: he said income from the region's natural resources would not cover the government subsidies it depends on.
So the fair summary is: the region has natural resources and lower development than parts of the state, and people disagree about why.
The part that does apply: selling raw, not finished
Even without calling it a curse, there is a simpler lesson in how raw goods move. A news report by the Press Trust of India, published in 2024, describes orange farmers near Nagpur facing export trouble. The report says shipments to Bangladesh used to run at about 6,000 tonnes a day until 2023, and that a grower it quotes put them at around 100 tonnes a day by May 2024, after Bangladesh raised its import duty. Farmers told reporters they relied on a pulp factory in Nanded, about 400 kilometres away, and hoped a processing plant planned near Nagpur would help.
Do not read too much into one season. But it shows the weakness of selling mostly raw goods: one buyer's rule change can hit everyone at once, and the value-adding steps, such as pulp, juice and packaging, happen somewhere else.
The cotton side of the story
Oranges are only one crop in the region. The same Press Trust of India report quotes a farmer, Manoj Khutate. He said he could earlier have sold cotton at about 8,500 rupees a quintal (a quintal is 100 kilograms). At the time of the report, prices were around 7,100 to 7,300, which the report says farmers feel does not cover the cost of growing it. That is one farmer's account in one season, so please read it as a voice from the ground and not as a statistic.
Still, it points at a pattern I want to name. A farmer who grows a crop and sells it raw is a price-taker. The price is set by buyers, weather and trade rules far away. The people who process the crop add value after that, and the ones who sell the finished product often have more say over the price.
None of this is special to India. I expect the same logic applies to crops and materials like coffee, cocoa, wool and timber elsewhere. It is a business lesson before it is a story about any one region.
Why the debate matters
I think the fact that experts disagree is a gift. It saves us from two lazy conclusions.
The first lazy conclusion is "natural resources are a blessing, so more is always better." The Wikipedia article gives enough examples of volatility and weak institutions to make us pause.
The second lazy conclusion is "natural resources are a curse, so avoid them." The article lists several researchers who argue that the evidence is weaker than the headline. Haber and Menaldo, for instance, argue that reliance on resources may even help democracy, though other researchers have challenged that. A 2019 meta-analysis of 69 studies, the article says, found no overall link between natural resources and conflict. And Timothy Mitchell argues that talk about an "oil curse" skips over the specific nature of oil.
If experts are still arguing, a business owner should be modest about the one-line version.
Three questions I would ask of any region or business
How concentrated is the income? Angola's 99.3 percent from oil and diamonds is an extreme case. A business that earns most of its money from one customer is a smaller version of the same risk.
What gets built on top? Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea are cited for spending on education. In a company, the equivalent is training people and building skills that do not depend on one product.
Who decides how the money is used? Institutions are the quiet factor in the article. In a business, that means clear rules for how profits are spent, who signs off and how mistakes are caught.
What I take from this
I like this idea because it teaches humility. What you have is not what you build. A shop with a great location, a founder with a famous name or a city with coal under it each hold something valuable, and each can get lazy about it.
One thing to try this week: write down the one thing that is your "resource": your location, your supplier, your biggest customer or your founder's name. Then write what percent of your income depends on it. If it is over half, list one step this quarter that would add something on top of it, such as a service, a finished product or a second customer.
Sources
- Wikipedia, "Resource curse": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse
- Wikipedia, "Vidarbha": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidarbha
- Press Trust of India via Outlook, "With Export Of Oranges Squeezed, Nagpur Region Farmers Pin Their Hope On Pulp", 2 May 2024: https://www.outlookindia.com/national/with-export-of-oranges-squeezed-nagpur-region-farmers-pin-their-hope-on-pulp
Record a 60-Second Founder Intro This WeekMarketing · Social Media · Storytelling
Comments
Sign up free, read the story and mark it finished to join the conversation.
Loading comments…